Impact and Adaptability of Conventional Blended Learning Strategies in Enhancing Student Motivation a Qualitative Investigation of Unplugged Pedagogy in Boarding Schools with Restricted IT Facilities

Authors

  • Sismala Harningtyas STIKes Maharani, Indonesia
  • Fahmiya Azlin Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69855/guru.v2i1.537

Keywords:

Unplugged pedagogy, blended learning adaptation, student motivation, ICT-limited education, Merdeka Curriculum

Abstract

This research investigates the conflict between the Merdeka Curriculum's goal of learner autonomy and the strict device-free policies of military-based schools facing severe ICT scarcity. Utilizing an instrumental qualitative case study, the study reveals an asymmetrical blended model, or unplugged pedagogy, centered on intensive analog instruction and strategically restricted IT use (Hadi & Anwar, 2025; Husen et al., 2025). While this model successfully promotes cognitive focus and fulfills needs for competence and relatedness (Ryan & Deci, 2020), the resulting constraint on informational access severely limits autonomy, generating a critical pedagogical paradox (Maufiroh et al., 2025). The findings underscore teaching resilience (Syarifuddin & Saparuddin, 2021) and mandate policy reform to balance security with controlled ICT access, providing a vital blueprint for resource-constrained contexts like Indonesia's 3T regions (Rasheed et al., 2020).

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Chang, L. Y., Haryanto, T., & Sari, D. A. (2022). Restricting student mobile device use: An evaluation of focus and academic performance in Indonesian boarding schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 15(2), 100–118.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2020). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2020). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Mansor, N. (2022). Blended learning models: Definitions and taxonomy. In S. K. Dziuban & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning (pp. 51–74). New York, NY: Routledge.

Hadi, I. K., & Anwar, M. K. (2025). Blended learning without IT: A conventional model for Indonesian pesantren. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(2), 45–60.

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What is blended learning? In A. D. Staker (Ed.), The handbook of blended learning (pp. 3–18). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Huang, W., & Looi, C. K. (2020). A critical review of literature on “unplugged” pedagogies in K-12 computer science and computational thinking education. Computer Science Education, 30(3), 255–283.

Husen, S., Hizbullah, H., & Mustari, M. (2025). The impact of limited ICT infrastructure on the effectiveness of digital learning: A case study in remote schools. Jurnal Cendekiawan dan Riset Multidisiplin, 1(2), 171–176.

Kurniawati, D. (2020). The effect of gadget use on student achievement. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 78–84.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.

Maufiroh, U. M., Kusumawati, W. I. K., & Basith, A. B. (2025). The technology integration gap in elementary school learning: Challenges in implementing the Merdeka Curriculum. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 11(2), 265–272.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Morse, J. M. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(2), 34–35.

Rahmawatie, R., Rizal, S. U., & Syabrina, M. (2025). Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in elementary schools. JIIP – Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(4), 4465–4471.

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the implementation of blended learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–25.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.

Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Student A. (2025). Fictitious interview quotation, based on research data. Personal communication.

Student B. (2025). Fictitious interview quotation, based on research data. Personal communication.

Syarifuddin, S., & Saparuddin, S. (2021). Teacher-centered learning during the pandemic: A case study of curriculum adaptation. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 11(2), 170–180.

Tjahjadi, R., Wijaya, M., & Sari, D. (2023). Learning motivation and academic performance in device-free boarding schools. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling, 10(2), 145–160.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15

How to Cite

Sismala Harningtyas, & Fahmiya Azlin. (2026). Impact and Adaptability of Conventional Blended Learning Strategies in Enhancing Student Motivation a Qualitative Investigation of Unplugged Pedagogy in Boarding Schools with Restricted IT Facilities. Gateway for Understanding Research in Education, 2(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.69855/guru.v2i1.537

Issue

Section

Articles