Correction and Retraction

Correction and Retraction Policy for Research and Evidence on Knowledge in Administration and Management — Medical Electronic Data and Information Systems (REKAM MEDIS):

Research and Evidence on Knowledge in Administration and Management — Medical Electronic Data and Information Systems (REKAM MEDIS) is committed to maintaining the integrity, reliability, and accuracy of the scholarly record. Corrections and retractions are handled in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

1. Correction

• Corrections are issued when minor errors are identified in a published article, such as typographical mistakes, inaccuracies in data presentation, author information, affiliations, or references, which may mislead readers but do not alter the main conclusions of the article.
• Correction requests may be submitted by authors, readers, reviewers, or editors after publication.
• Upon verification, the journal will publish an official correction notice linked to the original article to ensure transparency and maintain the accuracy of the scientific record.
• The purpose of corrections is to amend the scholarly record without compromising the integrity and validity of the research.

2. Retraction

• Retraction of an article may occur when serious errors affecting the validity, reliability, or integrity of the research findings are discovered, or in cases of ethical misconduct such as plagiarism, data fabrication, data falsification, duplicate publication, or unauthorized use of medical information.
• The retraction process follows the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and involves an investigation conducted by the editorial team and, when necessary, the authors’ affiliated institutions.
• Retraction notices will be clearly published and linked to the original article so that readers are fully informed of the reasons for the retraction.
• Retracted articles will remain accessible online with a clear retraction notice to preserve the integrity of the scholarly record and ensure transparency.

3. Handling Procedure

• Suspected errors, research misconduct, or ethical violations may be reported by authors, readers, reviewers, editors, or other stakeholders.
• The editorial team will conduct an initial assessment and may request clarification, supporting documentation, or additional information from the authors.
• If concerns are substantiated, appropriate corrective actions, including correction, expression of concern, or retraction, will be implemented depending on the severity of the issue.
• In cases involving disputes or disagreements, the journal will follow COPE guidelines to ensure a fair, transparent, and objective resolution process.

4. Responsibilities of All Parties

• Authors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy, originality, and integrity of all data, analyses, and content presented in their manuscripts.
• Editors and reviewers are responsible for maintaining the quality, credibility, and ethical standards of the publication process.
• The journal is committed to preserving an accurate and transparent scholarly record in the fields of medical records, health information management, electronic medical records, health data management, and health information systems.
• All parties involved in the publication process are expected to uphold the highest standards of research ethics and publication integrity.