Peer Review Process

Professional Evidence-based Research and Advances in Wellness and Treatment (PERAWAT) implementing the review process policy as follows:

1. Authors are advised to have checked for plagiarism and are free of other copyright violations before submitting.

2. The manuscript submitted by the author will go through a review process by the editor, especially checking for suitability with the scope and template of the Journal.

3. In this process, the editor will establish communication with the author so that the manuscript is worthy of being sent to reviewers or even returned/declined.

4. Manuscripts that have passed the steps above are sent to 2 reviewers for content review using the Single blind review method.

5. The review process will consider novelty, objectivity, methods, scientific impact, conclusions and references.

6. Reviewers will suggest improvements and/or accept/reject the manuscript.

7. The editor will decide by considering suggestions from reviewers whether the manuscript meets the requirements of Professional Evidence-based Research and Advances in Wellness and Treatment (PERAWAT).

8. The editor-in-chief's decision is final.

9. The entire review process is fully carried out based on the OJS web.