Experimental Study of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Connection Behavior with Base Isolation Method Using Natural Rubber Pads

Authors

  • Rona Ariyansyah Politeknik Negeri Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Etty Rabihati Politeknik Negeri Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Septi Putri Sandi Ratih Universitas Galuh, Indonesia
  • Ade Rizki Nurmayadi Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya, Indonesia
  • Achmad Idris Setianto Politeknik Negeri Pontianak, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69855/sipil.v2i2.798

Keywords:

Reinforced Concrete, Beam-Column Joint, Base Isolation, Natural Rubber Pad, Cyclic Loading, Seismic Performance

Abstract

Beam-column joints are widely recognized as the most seismically vulnerable components of reinforced concrete (RC) moment-resisting frames, while conventional elastomeric base isolation systems remain cost-prohibitive for low-rise residential construction in developing regions. Purpose: This study experimentally investigates RC exterior beam-column connections incorporating a low-cost natural rubber (NR) pad isolator, comparing it against a fixed-base connection under quasi-static cyclic lateral loading. Methods: Two half-scale RC specimens were constructed identically: Specimen A (fixed-base control) and Specimen B (base-isolated with a 150 × 150 × 20 mm NR pad, Shore hardness 60A). Both were subjected to displacement-controlled cyclic loading (0.25%–5.0% drift, ACI 374.1 protocol). Results: Specimen B exhibited a 26.2% reduction in peak lateral load (31.6 kN vs. 42.8 kN) and a 39.3% reduction in initial stiffness (5.1 vs. 8.4 kN/mm), while achieving higher ductility (μ = 5.8 vs. 3.2) and drift capacity exceeding 5.0% without significant degradation, versus 3.5% for Specimen A. Crack patterns revealed extensive diagonal shear cracking in Specimen A, whereas Specimen B showed minimal joint cracking, with drift accommodated through rubber pad shear deformation. Energy dissipation at 3.0% drift was lower for Specimen B (1,120 vs. 1,850 kN·mm), reflecting reduced joint damage. Implications: These findings demonstrate that a simple NR pad isolator can reduce force demand and damage concentration while improving deformation capacity, offering a practical seismic protection strategy for low-rise RC construction in resource-constrained regions.

References

Bandini, P. A. C., Siqueira, G. H., Padgett, J. E., & Paultre, P. (2022). Seismic performance assessment of a retrofitted bridge with natural rubber isolators in cold weather environments using fragility surfaces. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 27(6). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001873

Cici Jennifer Raj, J., & Vinod Kumar, M. (2022). Seismic response of low-to-high peak ground acceleration earthquakes in RC framed buildings with scrap tyre as base isolator using fast nonlinear analysis technique. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 23, 425–441.

Cici Jennifer Raj, J., & Vinod Kumar, M. S. (2022). Nonlinear modal time history analysis on RC framed buildings with scrap tyre as the base isolator for past Indian earthquakes. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, 7, 1–16.

Enhancing seismic resilience of reinforced concrete external beam column connection by employing an innovative prestressing method. (2024). Asian Journal of Civil Engineering.

Fu, W., Zhang, C., Sun, L., Askari, M., Samali, B., Chung, K. L., & Sharafi, P. (2017). Experimental investigation of a base isolation system incorporating MR dampers with the high-order single step control algorithm. Applied Sciences, 7(4), 344.

Habieb, A. B., Milani, G., Tavio, & Milani, F. (2017). Low cost rubber seismic isolators for masonry housing in developing countries. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1906, 090012. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5012369

Katsamakas, A. A., Belser, G., Vassiliou, M. F., & Blondet, M. (2022). Experimental investigation of a spherical rubber isolator for use in low income countries. Engineering Structures, 250, 113522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113522

Katsamakas, A. A., Belser, G., Vassiliou, M. F., Blondet, M., & Stojadinovic, B. (2021). Experimental investigation of spherical rubber seismic isolation bearings. COMPDYN Proceedings, 2021-June.

Kelly, J. M., & Konstantinidis, D. (2011). Mechanics of rubber bearings for seismic and vibration isolation (1st ed.). Wiley.

Khoshnudian, F., & Motamedi, D. (2013). Seismic response of asymmetric steel isolated structures considering vertical component of earthquakes. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17, 1333–1347.

Kim, Y.-C., Shahriyer, H., & Hu, J.-W. (2022). Seismic performance evaluation according to HSS and CFST columns of 3D frame buildings with rubber friction bearing (RFB). Materials, 15(4), 1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15041281

Konstantinidis, D. (2014). Advances in low-cost seismic isolation with rubber. Proceedings of the 10th U.S. National Conference in Earthquake Engineering.

Mishra, H. K. (2014). Pseudo-dynamic testing for seismic performance assessment of buildings with seismic isolation system using scrap tire rubber pad isolators. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 8(1), 73.

Pianese, G., Milani, G., & Formisano, A. (2022). Unbonded fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs) made of high damping natural rubber blends. 15th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM-XV) and 8th Asian Pacific Congress on Computational Mechanics (APCOM-VIII).

Putra, A. F., & Tavio. (2024). Effect of low-cost base isolator on performance of moderate-story buildings. In E. Maghsoudi Nia & M. Awang (Eds.), Advances in civil engineering materials (ICACE 2023) (Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Vol. 466, pp. 59–68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0751-5_6

Ru, Y., He, L., & Jiang, H. (2023). Parametric study on seismic performance of self-centering reinforced concrete column with bottom-placed rubber layer. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 17(8), 1145–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0945-2

Saeidzadeh, M. (2022). Experimental and numerical study on the performance of a novel self-centering beam-column connection equipped with friction dampers. Journal of Building Engineering, 52, 104338.

Seismic performance of a low-cost base isolation system for unreinforced brick masonry buildings in developing countries. (2021). Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 141, 106501.

Seismic response comparison of an RC frame structure with and without lead rubber bearing base isolation. (2025). Civil Engineering Research.

Tan, S., Yu, F., Bao, H., & Guan, Y. (2022). Experimental and numerical investigations on seismic behavior of RC beam to PVC-CFRP confined concrete column exterior joint with steel tube connector. Polymers, 14(21), 4712. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214712

Tang, L., Tian, W., Guan, D., & Chen, Z. (2022). Experimental study of emulative precast concrete beam-to-column connections locally reinforced by U-shaped UHPC shells. Materials, 15(12), 4066. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124066

Tavasoli, E., Rezaifar, O., & Kheyroddin, A. (2022). Seismic performance of RC joints retrofitted by external diagonal bolts. Journal of Building Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103691

Xiong, X., Xie, Y., Yao, G., Liu, J., Yan, L., & He, L. (2022). Experimental study on seismic performance of precast pretensioned prestressed concrete beam-column interior joints using UHPC for connection. Materials, 15(16), 5791. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165791

Xue, H., Ashour, A., Ge, W., Cao, D., Sun, C., & Cao, S. (2023). Seismic response of prestressed precast reinforced concrete beam-column joints assembled by steel sleeves. Engineering Structures, 276, 115328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115328

Ziraoui, A., Kissi, B., Aaya, H., & Azdine, I. (2024). Seismic behavior of base-isolated building structures with lead rubber bearings (LRBs). Procedia Structural Integrity, 61, 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2024.06.023

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

How to Cite

Rona Ariyansyah, Etty Rabihati, Septi Putri Sandi Ratih, Ade Rizki Nurmayadi, & Achmad Idris Setianto. (2026). Experimental Study of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Connection Behavior with Base Isolation Method Using Natural Rubber Pads. Structures, Infrastructure, Planning, Implementation, and Legislation, 2(2), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.69855/sipil.v2i2.798