Job Risk Analysis in the Implementation of Industrial Automation in the Electronics Sector

Authors

  • Lukman Handoko Politeknik Perkapalan Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Monita Rahayu Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf, Indonesia

Keywords:

Occupational Risk, Industry, Electronics Manufacturing, Safety Culture, Ergonomic

Abstract

The accelerating adoption of industrial automation technologies—including collaborative robots (cobots), automated optical inspection (AOI) systems, and programmable logic controllers (PLCs)—in electronics manufacturing introduces complex and evolving occupational risk profiles that existing safety frameworks are often inadequate to address. Purpose: This research aims to identify and evaluate occupational safety risks arising from the implementation of industrial automation in the electronic manufacturing sector, as well as to assess the effectiveness of Hierarchy of Controls-based interventions in reducing incident rates and strengthening the occupational safety culture. Methods: The research uses a mixed methods approach with a pre-post intervention study design without a control group. Hazard identification was conducted through task-based observations, semi-structured interviews with 186 workers, and analysis of historical incident data. Results: A total reduction in work incidents by 60.5% after the intervention. The highest risk comes from exposure to toxic smoke (RPN = 16). Elimination-based and engineering controls have the highest effectiveness (scores up to 9.4). Near-miss reporting increased by 187.3%, while the safety climate score significantly improved from 3.12 to 4.31 (p < 0.001) with a large effect size (d = 2.43). Implications: These findings indicate that a systematic intervention approach based on HIRA and the Hierarchy of Controls is effective in comprehensively improving safety performance, from both technical and organizational behavior aspects. Conclusion: This study confirms that structured risk analysis-based interventions are capable of significantly reducing work incidents and promoting a transformation of safety culture in the electronic automation industry environment.

References

Bhatt, D. L., Patel, N., & Sharma, R. (2021). Respiratory health outcomes among electronics manufacturing workers: A cross-sectional study across India and Vietnam. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 78(4), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-107012

Cagno, E., Micheli, G. J. L., Jacinto, C., & Masi, D. (2023). Systematic hazard identification and risk assessment in high-automation manufacturing: A validated task-based HIRA framework. Journal of Safety Research, 86, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.03.004

Gualtieri, L., Rauch, E., & Vidoni, R. (2021). Emerging research fields in safety and ergonomics in industrial collaborative robotics: A systematic literature review. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 67, 101998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.101998

Health and Safety Executive (HSE). (2019). Solder fume and you: Health risks and prevention in electronics manufacturing. HSE Books. https://doi.org/10.37970/rae.v3i1.50

Hollnagel, E. (2014). Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management. Ashgate Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315607511

International Federation of Robotics (IFR). (2023). World Robotics 2023: Industrial Robots. IFR Statistical Department. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19521.07522

International Labour Organization (ILO). (2022). Safety and Health in the Use of Machinery (ILO Code of Practice). ILO Publications. https://doi.org/10.54394/FHEM8239

Leigh, J. P. (2011). Economic burden of occupational injury and illness in the United States. Milbank Quarterly, 89(4), 728–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00648.x

Lim, J. P., & Tan, H. W. (2022). Injury risk concentration in robotic maintenance tasks within SMT electronics manufacturing: A retrospective analysis across ASEAN facilities. Safety Science, 148, 105638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105638

Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946

NIOSH. (2015). Hierarchy of Controls. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2015100

Pinder, A., Frost, G., & Kidd, M. (2023). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders and respiratory conditions in global electronics manufacturing: Prevalence, determinants, and prevention gaps. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 67(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxac081

Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Ashgate Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315543543

Robla-Gomez, S., Becerra, V. M., Llata, J. R., Gonzalez-Sarabia, E., Torre-Ferrero, C., & Perez-Oria, J. (2022). Working together: A review on safe human-robot collaboration in industrial environments. IEEE Access, 5, 26754–26773. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2773127

Zohar, D. (2010). Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(5), 1517–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019

Downloads

Published

2026-05-06

How to Cite

Lukman Handoko, & Monita Rahayu. (2026). Job Risk Analysis in the Implementation of Industrial Automation in the Electronics Sector. Journal of Occupational Safety, Health, and Environmental Management (K3), 1(1), 52–62. Retrieved from https://gpijournal.com/index.php/k3/article/view/562