Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics:

High-Impact Techniques for Understanding Analysis and Numerical Growth (HITUANG) [(e-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX)] is a peer-reviewed journal published by CV. Get Press Indonesia. The journal disseminates high-quality research in the fields of mathematical analysis, numerical methods, computational mathematics, mathematical modeling, applied mathematics, and related disciplines and is available online as an open access resource. This statement outlines the ethical standards and responsibilities of all parties involved in the publication process, including authors, the Editor-in-Chief, the Editorial Board, peer reviewers, and the publisher.

Journal Publication Ethics Guidelines:

1. Author Ethics

• Honesty and Clear Reporting
  Authors are required to report their research accurately, completely, and transparently. Mathematical derivations, numerical procedures, computational methods, data, simulations, and research results must be presented honestly and clearly. Authors should retain relevant research materials and data for verification when necessary.
• Originality and Anti-Plagiarism
  Submitted manuscripts must constitute the authors' original work and must not contain plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, or manipulation of mathematical, computational, or research results. All sources and previous works must be properly acknowledged and cited. Authors must not submit the same manuscript simultaneously to more than one journal.
• Proper Acknowledgement of Authorship
  All individuals who have made substantial contributions to the conception, methodology, analysis, computation, interpretation, or preparation of the manuscript should be appropriately recognized as authors. All listed authors are responsible for the content and integrity of the submitted work.
• Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
  Authors must disclose any financial, professional, institutional, or other conflicts of interest that could influence the research, analysis, interpretation, or publication of the manuscript.
• Correction of Errors
  If authors discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, they must promptly notify the editor and cooperate in correcting or, when necessary, retracting the article.

2. Editorial and Editorial Board Ethics

• Objective and Fair Editorial Decisions
  Editors should make publication decisions based on the manuscript's scientific quality, originality, relevance, and methodological soundness. Decisions must be made without discrimination based on race, gender, nationality, religion, institutional affiliation, or other personal characteristics.
• Confidentiality
  Information concerning submitted manuscripts must be kept confidential and disclosed only to individuals directly involved in the editorial and peer-review process.
• Avoiding Conflicts of Interest
  Editors and Editorial Board members must disclose and appropriately manage any conflicts of interest related to submitted manuscripts. Editors should not participate in editorial decisions when a conflict of interest exists.
• Handling Plagiarism and Ethical Violations
  Editors are responsible for taking appropriate action when plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, duplicate publication, or other forms of academic misconduct are suspected or identified.
• Transparency and Publication Integrity
  The journal management must maintain transparent editorial and publication policies and ensure that all manuscripts are handled consistently, fairly, and according to established scholarly publishing standards.

3. Reviewer Ethics

• Objective and Timely Assessment
  Reviewers should provide objective, constructive, and timely evaluations based on the scientific and academic content of the manuscript. Reviews should assess mathematical correctness, methodological rigor, originality, clarity, and relevance without discrimination based on the identity or affiliation of the authors.
• Confidentiality of Manuscripts
  Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and must not disclose, reproduce, distribute, or use unpublished information for personal or professional advantage before publication.
• Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
  Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could affect their objectivity and should decline the review when such conflicts may compromise an impartial assessment.
• Recognition of Relevant Work
  Reviewers should identify relevant published works that have not been cited when appropriate. Any recommendation for citation should be based on genuine academic relevance and should not be made for the purpose of increasing citations without justification.

4. General Policy

• High-Impact Techniques for Understanding Analysis and Numerical Growth (HITAUNG) follows the principles and guidance of the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) as an important reference for maintaining publication ethics, academic integrity, and responsible scholarly publishing.
• All parties involved in the publication process—including authors, editors, reviewers, and journal managers—must comply with the principles of integrity, neutrality, fairness, transparency, confidentiality, and honesty throughout all stages of publication.
• HITUNG is committed to maintaining the integrity of mathematical and computational research by addressing allegations of plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, duplicate publication, authorship disputes, conflicts of interest, and other forms of academic misconduct appropriately.

By implementing this publication ethics policy, High-Impact Techniques for Understanding Analysis and Numerical Growth (HITAUNG) seeks to maintain high scientific standards, promote responsible research practices, protect the integrity of the peer-review process, and strengthen trust among authors, reviewers, editors, researchers, and readers.