Herbal Feed Additives from Indigenous Plants: Natural Growth Promoters as Antibiotic Alternatives in Sustainable Broiler Production

Authors

  • Dwi Wijayanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Luwuk
  • Desna Ayu Wijayanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Karanganyar

Keywords:

herbal feed additives, broiler chickens, sustainable feed

Abstract

The extensive use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) in broiler feed has raised global concerns due to antimicrobial resistance and harmful residues in animal products, which threaten public health and food security. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, economic feasibility, and safety of herbal feed additives derived from locally available Indonesian plants as natural alternatives to AGPs in broiler production. The herbal materials used included katuk leaves (Sauropus androgynus), ginger rhizomes (Curcuma xanthorrhiza), turmeric rhizomes (Curcuma longa), green betel leaves (Piper betel), mangosteen peels (Garcinia mangostana), papaya leaves (Carica papaya), and soursop leaves (Annona muricata). A total of 200 day-old Cobb 500 broiler chicks were allocated into four experimental groups with five replications and reared for 35 days. The chicks were fed a basal diet of corn and soybean meal supplemented with herbal additives at inclusion levels of 1% and 2%. Parameters measured included growth performance (ADG, FCR, and EPEF), carcass traits, gut health indicators, and blood profiles. Statistical analysis showed a significant improvement in ADG of 12–18% (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that herbal formulations from Indonesian plants are viable and safe alternatives to AGPs.

References

Sugiharto, S. (2018). Herbal supplements for sustainable broiler production in Indonesia in the post-antibiotic era. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 33, Article 143. https://doi.org/10.4314/lrrd.v33i8.3

Ao, X., et al. (2021). Effect of a phytogenic feed additive on broiler performance. Animals, 11, 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030745

Manullang, J. R. (2025). Implementation of nano-particle bawang tiwai feed additives in broilers. JIIIP, 28(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiiip.v28i1.36507

Hidayat, M. N., et al. (2023). Herbal plants as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters. Nukleus Peternakan, 10(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.35508/nukpet.v10i1.18671

Abd El-Hack, M. E. (2025). Role of phytogenic feed additives in poultry growth and health. Frontiers in Animal Science, 6, 1703112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2025.1703112

Windisch, W., et al. (2021). Phytogenic feed additives in poultry nutrition. Animals, 11, 3478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123478

Sugiharto, S. (2021). Herbal supplements for broiler production in Indonesia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 33, 103. https://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd33/8/33103sgh_u.html

Montesqrit, et al. (2020). Encapsulated turmeric extract as a feed additive for broilers. ALIVE Journal, 5(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.25077/alive.v5i1.53

Tim YANA. (2023). Medicinal plant extracts as feed additives for broilers. JITTU. https://ejournal.yana.or.id/index.php/jittu/article/view/421

Unisma Team. (2024). Local feed ingredients for poultry production. Riset Unisma. https://riset.unisma.ac.id

Polinela Skripsi. (2023). Herbal feed additives in broiler chickens [Undergraduate thesis]. Politeknik Negeri Lampung. https://repository.polinela.ac.id/4623/

SIHO Jurnal. (2024). Local herbal plants as poultry feed additives. JIPENA. https://sihojurnal.com

Garuda. (2023). Bioactive plant compounds as alternative feed additives. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=1672822

JIM Unisma. (2025). Dynamics of herbal feed additive application. https://jim.unisma.ac.id

Frontiers. (2022). Alternative feed additives to antibiotics in livestock production. https://www.frontiersin.org

Downloads

Published

2025-03-14

How to Cite

Dwi Wijayanti, & Desna Ayu Wijayanti. (2025). Herbal Feed Additives from Indigenous Plants: Natural Growth Promoters as Antibiotic Alternatives in Sustainable Broiler Production. Technology and Research in Animal and Agricultural Knowledge (TARANAK), 1(1), 51–59. Retrieved from https://gpijournal.com/index.php/taranak/article/view/479