Mass Spectrometry-Based Purity Assessment of Hydrogen from Different Production Pathways: Compliance Evaluation with ISO 14687:2019 Standards

Authors

  • Rismen Sinambela Universitas Kristen Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69855/science.v2i4.272

Keywords:

Hydrogen Purity, Green Hydrogen, Fuel Cell, ISO 14687:2019, Mass Spectrometry, GC-MS, Hydrogen Economy, Simulation Modeling

Abstract

The global transition toward low-carbon energy has positioned hydrogen (H₂) as a key renewable fuel, particularly for applications in fuel cells that require ultra-high purity. Ensuring hydrogen quality is essential to prevent catalyst poisoning and system degradation, as defined in ISO 14687:2019 standards. This study presents a simulation-based analysis of hydrogen purity using a Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) modeling approach to evaluate three production pathways: green hydrogen (from electrolysis), grey hydrogen (from steam methane reforming), and a fuel cell–grade feedstock.The simulation predicts impurity profiles such as O₂, N₂, CO, CO₂, CH₄, sulfur compounds, and water vapor, comparing each with ISO threshold limits. Results indicate that green hydrogen generally complies with ISO standards, while grey hydrogen exceeds CO₂ and sulfur limits. The fuel cell–grade sample shows near-complete conformity due to simulated purification processes such as pressure swing adsorption.These findings highlight that analytical modeling can effectively predict hydrogen quality and compliance potential across different production routes. The study emphasizes that advancing hydrogen technology requires not only cleaner production methods but also reliable analytical simulations to support quality assurance and sustainability in future hydrogen economies.

References

Gonzalez, R., Patel, S., & Murray, J. (2020). Analytical challenges in hydrogen purity monitoring for fuel cell applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(32), 15984–15992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.210

Hwang, S., Lee, K., & Park, J. (2022). Development of selective membranes for hydrogen purification and CO removal. Journal of Membrane Science, 658, 120724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120724

Jones, P. (2019). Contaminant profiles of hydrogen from natural gas reforming. Energy Science & Engineering, 7(5), 1385–1394. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.411

Kim, H., Lee, J., & Choi, S. (2017). Mass spectrometric approaches for trace gas analysis in hydrogen energy systems. Journal of Analytical Science and Technology, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-017-0122-8

Kim, Y., & Yang, H. (2025). Hydrogen purity: Influence of production methods, purification techniques, and analytical approaches. Energies, 18(3), 741. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030741

Lee, D., Cho, H., & Kim, T. (2021). Advances in fuel cell contamination diagnostics using mass spectrometry. Applied Energy, 302, 117501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117501

Lee, S., & Park, K. (2022). Guarantee of origin schemes for renewable hydrogen: Analytical and policy perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111786

Müller, T., & Schneider, R. (2020). Catalyst poisoning in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: The role of carbon monoxide. Journal of Power Sources, 448, 227575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227575

Nguyen, T. H., Pham, D., & Li, X. (2019). Impact of CO impurities on PEM fuel cell performance: A review. Electrochimica Acta, 298, 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.056

Ortega, A., & Silva, M. (2019). Advances in GC–MS for trace gas detection in clean energy applications. Analytical Methods, 11(21), 2745–2753. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9AY00355F

Qi, Z., & Kaufman, A. (2020). CO and CO₂ tolerance and removal for PEM fuel cell catalysts. Journal of Power Sources, 185(2), 736–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.02.025

Smith, L., Zhang, Y., & Brown, K. (2020). Electrolytic hydrogen production: Purity, performance, and challenges. Renewable Energy, 145, 2312–2323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.099

Tanaka, H., Yamamoto, M., & Saito, K. (2021). Carbon and sulfur contaminants in hydrogen from natural gas reforming processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 310, 127479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127479

Zhang, P., Liu, W., & Chen, D. (2023). Advanced real-time monitoring of hydrogen contaminants via quadrupole mass spectrometry. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(17), 6542–6553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.044

Zhao, Q., Chen, Y., & Wang, D. (2021). Online mass spectrometry for hydrogen refueling station safety and quality assurance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(25), 13345–13356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.095

Downloads

Published

2025-10-25

How to Cite

Rismen Sinambela. (2025). Mass Spectrometry-Based Purity Assessment of Hydrogen from Different Production Pathways: Compliance Evaluation with ISO 14687:2019 Standards. Science Get Journal, 2(4), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.69855/science.v2i4.272